Single Malt Scotch Ratings

The blogger of the year ...


... is not yet certain, but you can choose! The girls team again has a good selection taken!

up at 31.1. you can choose your favorite from their top ten - this overview of DieStandard may help! We guarantee: If this is not easy. And that's good!

PS: The winner of last year, incidentally, was the DIY filmmaker woman love . Be sure to look!

Healthy Eating Catchy Solgan

"More pride, their women!"

take Slowly but surely we walk in the new year and slowly awaken from our winter sleep ... I promise! And because we hope that it will be a good year, we will start just fine with something: 2011 is the fact Hedwig Dohm year.
? Hedwig who "some may wonder - and this all to (un) fairly. On the one hand, there is a big failure in 1831, born feminist who wrote with a sharp pen against patriarchy, not to know - the other, it is just one of those historical women characters who are all too often forgotten.

The practice forces the women into a mental Modecostüm. It must once acceptirten attributes of her sex to make a show, whether the Nature has equipped them to or not. "Bills", calls the company to her, "as you are, is irrelevant." And that bends and distorts the woman, this poor moral Clown, her soul, if possible. (Dohm 1876)

This is how Hedwig Dohm 19 876 (!) The situation of women. As of 1872, relatively late, at 41, she entered a publicist for equality between women and men, but without directly involved in the women's movement. Dohm saw the women's movement as a "respectable, modest movement," in which a "class of people" begging for their existence as alms.

"For me is the beginning of all true progress in the field of women's issues in the voting rights of women, "she wrote 1873rd Your first feminist works ("What do the pastors of Women" (1872), "The scientific Emancipation of Women" (1874) and "Women's Nature and Law" (1876)) have rarely attention and if so, they were criticized. Above all, the response to the political demands for more political participation rights for women (such as the claim of women's suffrage 1873), remained in the ranks of the women's movement was restrained.

is now so celebrated Dohm. On the project page you'll find everything about the witty woman and her works. Also highly recommended: Many of her works are online - wow! And although here . (Insider tip: Be sure to read "The anti-feminists" - maybe even someone you may know ;-)!?

There are many reasons to read Dohms posts - her dry humor and analytical acumen to make every evening verlümmelten compensated. But above all: let us inspire - what's nicer to start year?

And we leave the final word, because it's fits so nicely (yes, (unfortunately), 110 years later), even her own:

More pride, their women! How is it possible to that you are not rebels against the contempt that hits you still. - Also today? Yes, even today. (...) More pride, their women! The proud can fall ill, but he is not despised. Only on the neck, to bend and enters the foot of the supposed master. (Dohm, 1901)

How Fast Can You Get A Duplicate Pa Vehicle Title

'Gate Keeper' for critics of climate change

who drew hope that the 'pardon Klimaerwärmungs'lüge' Klimawandel'lüge finally comes to the critical test, has probably made a mistake.

In the U.S. House of Representatives, the majority shifted in favor of the Republicans, so the Democrat Barrack Obama in the future, probably with more have to expect resistance. At the forefront of reform opponents, is as in this article is , a man named Fred Upton, who wants to take action against the new emission rules. He is supported here by a certain John Shimkus, who does not believe in global warming, because - and here's - do not allow God to destroy the earth. John Shimkus seems to think it to be able to prove this with quotations from the Bible.

Thank you dear, dear wife and TAZ Passenheim that you people can think for themselves, and do not believe any propaganda, religious nutcases throw in a pot. And I have nothing against people who believe in Bible verses, although I myself am not religious. Bible verses should be left in a scientific debate, however, sidelined. It would not be necessary to counter with Bible verses. And anyway, John Shimkus has said so because in general, how you present it?

there really enough credible people, especially scientists in this field who doubt man-made climate change and can give very good and scientific explanations. They do not need to cite Bible verses and leave the 'prefer Glaubens'frage those who have the Klimawandelpropagandisten that no serious have scientific evidence of their questionable assumptions follow want.

really should of course everyone can believe what he wants, because I'm quite tolerant. But it is on the climate change issue so that the consequences of this heresy, the introduction of a 'green economy' will be depleted in the majority of mankind, and even starvation, whereas the major sources of pollution (mind you: Pollution is not yet climate change!) continue to fly in their private jets around the globe and operate in the basement are heated pools.

this way, a few examples Critics of faith that do not Bible verses ...

كراك ميكر

on the current dioxin scandal and past and future price increases for food

Yet another food scandal of dioxin pollution in chicken eggs. Bon appetit ... Debt, except as some invited guests remarked on the news channel N-TV, ultimately the consumer. Wishing namely its food simply do not pay enough, the price war in the area of food is nowhere as brutal as in Germany. Nowhere in Europe are as cheap as the food with us. The German consumer is more willing to invest in good oil for his car, as in his food.

They have highly questionable such statements, I think. With cheap half-truths presented to us as "news" and opinions of so-called "experts", we are told the world ...

would have been worth mentioning, that Germany has created in recent years one of the largest low-wage sectors , Boasts as former Chancellor Schroeder public - of course not with us, but in Davos ...

At about 7 million people, or 10 percent of the population, either in full or in spite of work are partly dependent on social transfers from the State and more under as close to the subsistence living, it is no wonder, if not more money for food can be issued.

to want to be derived from statistical data, the German consumer would spend more money for the oil change on his car, as for food, I think is more than questionable. Times completely ignoring the fact that an oil change in a car only once a year is paid, food must be consumed but every day of the year.

In addition, you can simplify statistics collected from data of millions of people not in such a way as if it was actually always the same people. That could make it, perhaps, if the living conditions of large sections of populations such as were identical. This is not however so, so you have to ask, are those who want to spend much money for the engine oil of their vehicle, even the same ones who have to skimp on food so extreme? Answer: I do not know, and I know I do not know ...

But I assume that this is different acting groups in society: those who have little money for food, eating, and therefore have the so-called "bars" with. Who ever anyway no money for a car, and do not need machine oil. Then those who have a car and need for various reasons, some come to it in their low-paid, and for which therefore the money for food is very scarce.

And finally, even those who have a car, perhaps a limited budget surplus and therefore do not skimp on the machine oil. Whether that are exactly the same, of which an want to spend money on food? I doubt it ...

Pretty sure I'm on the other hand here is that this scandal once again used to create the right atmosphere to prepare ourselves and to rising food prices. Whether rising food prices will actually provide more quality, I dare even to doubt. Because despite the supposed climate warming, it will in the years to continue falling temperatures give . Cool weather is not good for the planet - quite the contrary. When the sun and heat are missing, increases the risk of crop failure. Therefore, the food prices will likely continue to rise. Because they are a variety of reasons anyway already risen - for example due to the use of agricultural land for the cultivation of biodiesel, to counteract the global warming is not occurring. Another reason for the worldwide rise in food prices also is the destruction of local farms and the acquisition of agricultural land by the International Food Quartell consisting of Monsanto, Unilever, Kraft, etc.

Beautiful, exceptionally, with future price increases also is sometimes to the consumer, and not considering the returns of any shareholders. Of those, will still continue to have no more money for the purchase of food, then probably expected to not complain when they find that they have machine-poured cooking oil over the salad instead ...