Pattycakeonline Username

Public ePetition: Guideline for the treatment of public ePetitionen

This petition has been (yet) been submitted to the Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag.

wording of the petition / What you want to reach specific with your petition?

The German Bundestag may decide that, in disagreement with the publication of a public petition made the rejection detail the reasons and unfounded.

is also rejecting an appeal to be resolved.
should be created for the petitioner the opportunity to revise the petition is rejected according to a release permit.

Reason:
be present petitions, which are not approved for publication sweeping rejected on the grounds that the petition would violate the rules of procedure.
the motivation is not specified - for example, is contrary to what point the directive. Thus, it is not possible at first, the petition to "heal" if necessary to allow them to publish to.

Even by phone is given no information, by pointing out that this would violate the procedural guidelines.

It is understandable that the petitions were rejected for various reasons as a whole, as certain conditions are not met.
It is not clear if a publication is rejected generally and without giving valid reasons.
It should be possible, reasons that militate against disclosure remedy, if necessary.

are currently reply to such written questions to the Petitions Committee, pointing out that the Committee can arbitrarily decide whether a petition is published or not.

The current approach gives the shells suspected censorship of certain subjects to enable or to take even before. This should be avoided.

Furthermore I call to clarify the rules and the point 4 d) without replacement.
"Rule 4 d) from a publication may not be required, especially if the petitioner already present public petitions on the website of the Petitions Committee is"

This is obviously no substantive argument which precludes a petition.

Comment:

If the current approach of government censorship of public petitions?