It sounds simple and hears not - always get I e-mail from environmental organizations, in which I am asked to ask politicians to write the climate change in the law. In this case all the facts speak against global warming. On the contrary, in recent years, it was getting colder. Therefore, one has probably changed the terms and now speaks of 'climate change'. Climate change is normal and there is no evidence that we as humans can influence the climate in general.
scapegoat for change is the so-called greenhouse gas CO2. It will be responsible for it is getting warmer on Earth. Here, the greenhouse gases from the earth is more than 90% water vapor. This water vapor forms over the oceans when the water evaporates here. The CO2 content of the atmosphere to greenhouse gases is negligible - it is about 4%. And of this only a fraction of people is caused. There are currently living on the earth about 6 billion people, all of which produce in one or the other way, CO2, while they are still alive - for all men (and, incidentally, all animals) breathe CO2. In order to achieve a change that at all can still read in numbers, would be a lot of people pulling out of the life cycle.
carbon dioxide is something very terrible, the media claim in a tour. They speak of Carbon, they usually show us the picture of an exhaust gas, a coal power plant or a nuclear reactor. Carbon dioxide sounds so nice for coal, and coal sounds again after pollution. However, carbon dioxide is a colorless gas that is used by plants for photosynthesis. It has to do only secondarily with exhaust gases and harmful, it is not - in fact, CO2 is a natural fertilizer for plants and is therefore introduced in greenhouses . We also live in a time not of an excessive presence of CO2. On the contrary, according to Dr. Tim Ball, we are in terms of the CO2 level, even at a low point. There were of human history has much higher values - even though the population at that time was much lower and there also was no industrialization. The high rates have not hurt the earth - on the contrary.
Landfried Professor of the University of Heidelberg says in the context of scientific research 'post-normal science'. The science is not to acquire knowledge and make connections that could benefit from their knowledge to benefit mankind. Rather, the fear of humanity to be made because the target is certain: The complete de-industrialization of our society. And because you the humanity not simply be put to eliminate himself, has to serve just the science and devils come out to conjure up any statistics, they were established according to scientific standards or not. It's like a religion, it is easy to believe and think who can not because all the facts to the contrary, is a kind of heretic, or even be thrown with Holocaust deniers in a pot by calling him a climate-deniers.
Probably one imagines that humanity will soon live in tin huts, not eat, and best not to breathe - so all generated CO2. Do we really such a society?
We might not, but the billionaires of this world to do anyway - Al Gore, Maurice Strong, Bill Gates, etc. But not for himself - she probably live in big houses with swimming pool in the basement. No, for us they do such a society. Do not worry about the earth drives them to - the 'elites' of this world have always been obsessed with the idea that the earth is overpopulated. This can be in Thomas Malthus, and read at Julian and Aldous Huxley, who, in his non-fiction 'reunion with the brave new world' writes clearly, if the human race continues to introduce so increased, we would have a dictatorship.
reason for this is that the resources of this planet are too short. We were shown pictures of populous cities, such as in India, thus creating the impression that India is already over-populated entirely. Large tracts of India are inhabited by people. According Alan Watt there are huge areas of untouched nature in India. The same scenario we've probably also in China. Moreover, one could slow the population growth very easily if we were to allow those countries to develop more industrial. But this is exactly what not to. On the contrary, the whole planet will be de-industrialized.
But why all this, why are our elites so obsessed with the idea that the population could grow too much? Is it not rather the fact that the richer members of elite families, who are pushing hundreds of incest in number compared with the normal population continues to fall behind? Or has failed, perhaps because the win, the experiment 'Internet' with which it was hoped that new knowledge in relation to group networks, and we still have more control - more and more people use the Internet as a source of information and contact from the propaganda machine from television. We will always be less easy to control.
is why the elites have set a target to reduce the population. If this is not done voluntarily, it must be forced upon us precisely. John Holdren, a close associate of Barack Obama, a so-called 'Science Csar', already proposed in the 80 years before in his book 'Ecoscience' to sterilize the population by coercive measures. Examples should be provided drinking water supplies with sterilizing agents or young girls at puberty, forced birth control to be planted under the skin that could be removed only after the application and examination of the relevant authorities.
In the UK, currently forced sterilizations are under discussion. Under the guise of the child's welfare should only be affected by drug addicts, as they anyway could not take care of their children. The first drug has had to sterilize it - we offered him a sum of 200 pounds , and he agreed. What is currently voluntary nor should soon be enacted as a sanction. If the law is first displayed, you can expect that it will be extended soon to other population groups. Julian Huxley, brother of Aldous Huxley and the first director of UNESCO was of the opinion: 'unemployment should be a reason for be sterilized. " If this criterion be introduced only once, it will affect very many people. Another reason for forced sterilization could be soon and mental health. And as Bertrand Russell at the beginning of the last century in his book 'The scientific age' writes the criterion sanity will one day be interpreted so narrowly that more people would be considered mentally abnormal - another reason for forced sterilization.
It is therefore urgent that the pseudo-cult of global warming to renounce to use his common human understanding that hour, and to find reasonable. Bill Gates speaks very public that vaccines are to be used to reduce the population. A century of vaccination usher he wants, with vaccines would be administered by spraying. The propaganda does not stop in front of children. Means brutal videos, in which children are threatened with murder, should not be inspired to reduce their CO2 trace, have recently made the rounds. Meanwhile, even the bona fide needs but understand at last that something is wrong, and to what extent we are being lied to for decades.
It's not about the money noble nature. On the contrary, its members are the first to ravage the nature of greed. They are concerned about reducing humanity to a figure in which it is easier to control. It's not enough that you zuschüttet us with chemicals and propaganda. No, they want us dead, because we have fulfilled our purpose. The automation has progressed, that you hardly even need workers. On the scientific one will also allow anyone the normal population on the part of elites repeatedly spoken of a "priesthood". The priests will join you'll get just with the race. For everyone else here is admittance.
us against the massive climate change laws and defend against the CO2 tax, and now though, while we still have a roof over their head and enough money to give us at least to survive. We must do everything to educate our people about the relationships and the dangers. Most people pushing these issues, probably from Anst away simply because they feel powerless. Powerless as we are all but only have given up because too many people. If successful, it could put enough people from the dark machinations of the elites in knowledge, we would be enough to defend ourselves, and once and for all the supremacy of those who are using the money system control to an end.
Rise like lions after slumber
fall in numbers Unvanquishable
Shake your chains to earth like dew Which in
sleep has on you -
Ye are many - they are few.
Percy Shelley
0 comments:
Post a Comment