Gebruiksaanwijzing Hairscroo

shining light to fly the pirate flag on anti-nuclear Reichstag

German nuclear policy has never been as sexy as in the portrait of Mrs. Merkel. The Pirates put up the Anti-nuclear flag on the Reichstag.

The anti-nuclear flag is hoisted. (Photo: Olaf.Haensel, 2010-09-18)

have pirates from several states, together with 100,000 people before the Diet demonstrated in Berlin against the latest energy-political machinations of the Federal Government.

One of the highlights before Reichtsgsgebäude was the action in which hoisted a pirate with the help of balloons, the anti-nuclear flag on the flagpole between the European flag and Germany Flag.

. "Liar, the government and prostituted women Merkel, the energy giant, Jürgen Stemke, member understood the board of the Pirate Party of Lower Saxony, along the message of many posters and banners of the mass demonstration, adding:

" As the government do with the welfare of Citizens and democratic principles is simply leaps around shamelessly!

The pirates in Lower Saxony call on citizens to make their mark!
The pirates in Lower Saxony call on citizens to fight back!

Jürgen Stemke continued: "I call on citizens to put today on 100% renewable electricity and to change the will And this is now you try it out Before you Mrs Merkel Join!.!"

Recommended Gynae In Mumbai

No call for immediate withdrawal party

has once again defended a party member of the Pirate Party his resignation public.

Before now, the resignation and exit wave is really hard .... (Imho it is bad enough)


First:
Felix, the reasons that you are anführst for me with the important policy issues.


Also, I've been thinking about leaving - but not about retirement. My exit statement is formulated for a long time.

Right now I'm still hoping that the party is back on track. As economical Schwabe I have set myself a deadline of at least the end of the year is already paid for.


course, the activities can be in the party, especially during the last several weeks and the news of emerging threats worst room for speculation about the events in the party. The thesis that the party of radicals and extremists hijacked imho is not unreasonable.

I myself have not received any threat, but it was only a request not to do anything specific to me again approached with. I should not interpret this request explicitly as a threat.

The words of the aforementioned Pirates of you speak volumes. I already had several opportunities to communicate with him. My picture and my impressions about the procedure for introducing LQFB has confirmed and consolidated. On the human component and the social skills I'm just appalled. However, I hope the uneasy nothing.



A resignation is nothing really bad. It is a democratic act A vote with their feet. It is an act true grassroots democracy. Something for which the Pirates last year made it even really strong. Anyone who is outraged over a withdrawal from the Pirate Party, wants to keep this first and then think again, why he himself is not in another party member.
In general, we find ideological discrepancies.


The interests of the members of the Pirate Party have apparently changed greatly since last year. Thesis: A significant part of the new members understand the core issues of the party otherwise than in the party program is, or than what was originally intended.

I have tried in recent days and weeks again and again make this clear in my posts on the mailing lists, by showing conflicts between the current action and the party said during the election. As above, here already.

disclosed this latest action by the party of course, ideological discrepancies in members who stand for the original objectives.


A resignation is a decision which may be revised at any time. So really nothing at all bad.




Before now many follow the call of Felix and escape directly and immediately, maybe an idea as a compromise:

Sends a notice of resignation to your Board with copy to the national board.
Terminated the outlet pass on the fruitless 3rd Reminder to the membership fee 2011th

Tells the boards that you will like to re-member when the party is committed back to the original objectives.

If you like, make the wiki on a page and must sign a declaration in addition there virtually. - You can also right there, arrange a new party set up .. Last year during the election campaign I was even asked, what happens when the pirates then betray their ideals. I thought we found just the pirates party ... The name change is obviously stupid marketing point.


Otherwise, if it is "only" the liquid is and you since the other hand, it just tries to ignore - even realize I to myself that that is difficult. In NDS is on the active participation LQFB about 2% of party members. They are about 10% to 20% of the people who come to party conferences. The relevance is not outstanding. It is outstanding, once the "enemy" are gone. There

for applications to the party conference in Chemnitz is also a classic application factory (which also has many shortcomings - opinion before I consider absolutely wrong - to exchange views to be absolutely necessary, a list of pros and cons as well). Prepare in advance before: Very important when you come! So that you know what their vote.



What me about a paradigm shift it is striking just been written into the blue ..:

idea of pirates: the transparency of policy decisions - not a transparent citizen
pirates today: call the glass politician and demand that every citizen, heavily involved politically politician is. The keyword: pirate party Stasi = 3.0 makes the rounds already.

idea of pirates: Politics do with competence.
pirates today: a system is brought into use that was developed in an ad hoc basis without the effects and conditions previously estimated. - In classic project management was deliberately omitted. A rapid Exchange of the development team was thus impossible. Important concerns such as data protection, the project achieved only after the completion of version 1.0. .... And much more. An impact assessment or other project documentation such as requirements analysis, legal opinions, specifications, UML diagrams do not exist. The thing is a pure hack.


idea of pirates: rule of law and strengthen the Basic Law.
pirates today: The policy manager provides a grease cup at a time on yourself and jump into it. (Justification of threats against plaintiff, it is not constitutionally justified requests prior to the court for leaks, publication of results from previous decision their decision ...)
pirates today: Pirates with a different opinion are threatened with violence.


idea of Pirates: curb lobbying
pirates today are extremely populist themes launched and factually incorrect (eg LQFB on BPT)


idea of Pirates: Pirates
data economy today, we not only collect sensitive personal data, but make it public immediately.


idea of pirates: No voting machines, but Feie, secret, now by any comprehensible elections
Pirates: One is treading a road map that at the end of all political decisions determined electronically, and have found no system-related requirements, the pirates meet in elections, can.



The change went from a party that warned because of their technical competence against abuse of this same technology to a party that wants to do because of their technical expertise, what is technical.
The party has spent time as a humanist party. Of expertise in humanism, but I can not see much at the moment.


me, it has long been impossible to recruit for the party. Formerly active pirates have taken all the way back, have disappeared from the scene.


An observer

Ben 10 Alien Forceepisode 43

The non-voters strongest force in the government are becoming

Dear non-voters,

congratulations on the election victory! At 29%, the non-voters now strongest political force in the German Bundestag ! I also congratulate the rapid conclusion of the coalition agreement with the CDU / CSU and FDP. The party of non-voters take part in the government unconditionally - without imposing their own requirements.

This made the non-voters in Germany really moving and really politics, because thanks to your mandate and because of an unconstitutional electoral system in Germany we have the extraordinary situation that our country is run from the comfort of people who are just about third of the population were elected by ballot.

I still find it sad that you - have used your voice is not active - than non-voters.

However, I wish you every success in the new government and all of us a bright future,

Stemke.

PS: I also congratulate all politicians and parties who have contributed in recent years to the sustainable strengthening of the political power of non-voters. As you can see, well, governments can benefit from this.

clarification:

fact, I consider this development for more than questionable.

It must be done even more for that very reason a new policy!

Ncio Robin And Nami Hot Games

ePetitionen censored?

On 30 July 2009, I have an online ePetition public on nuclear supply and disposal https: submitted / / epetitionen.bundestag.de.

After the petition on 15th September 2009 was still not online and the status of the petition in my profile "status not available" was, I was responsible to the Clerk of the Petitions Committee by phone

Jaedtke my wife could tell you that on 31 August 2009, a receipt mailed to me was. There I was informed that the petition does not qualify under guideline for the treatment of public petitions and therefore not published. She would like a general petition to be treated and it was a request to the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety was made.

They wanted me to call on procedural grounds does not say on what conditions it lacks detail. But I could submit a written request. This I have done with the following letters:

Date: 16th September 2009 11:47:19 EDT

To: post.pet @ bundestag.de

Subject: request Petiton Pet 2-16-18-279-059003 / Nuclear Supply and disposal

Good day Mrs. Jaedtke,
many thanks for the friendly phone call from 15. September 2009. Too bad you can not answer my question by phone. As requested, I hereby put this in writing by mail.
they have informed me that my 30 July 2009 was not published as a public petition filed petitions because they do not fulfill the relevant requirements under the Directive for the treatment of public petitions. The petition, however, would be treated according to the general procedural principles for petitions.
you have not specified the points on which the petition does not comply with these rules. I have offered upon notification of violation to adjust accordingly the petition - to 'cure', therefore, to allow publication. I consider the petition by such general interest that I want to achieve a release.

Even after renewed study of the policies and the Petitions by me and by others we are still not clear why the publication of the petition was rejected. It is a major issue. Precisely why I have filed the petition as a public petition.

I ask you to give its opinion by stating the exact reasons that led to the rejection of the publication of the petition. I request that the petition according to 'cure' to be allowed in order for a publication, or for suggestions as to how the publication of a petition to be achieved.

Can you at the re-examination on 30 Explore July 2009 petition submitted any reasons which militate against disclosure, I ask you to publish the petition and me in this to inform case.

Sincerely,
Stemke

PS:

research based on Page http://www.bundestag.de/bundestag/ausschuesse/a02/index.jsp specified email address petitionsausschuss@bundestag.de does not seem to be valid.

\u0026lt;Petitionsausschuss@bundestag.de

>

:: From the error log

193.17.232.1_does_not_like_recipient./Remote_host_said: _550_5.1.1_ \u0026lt; ;. petitionsausschuss@bundestag.de >: _Recipient_address_rejected: _User_unknown/Giving_up_on_193.17.232.1 /

Furthermore, I would like because of this incident like 2 more petitions . Submit However, at present prevents me concern. In particular, the section 4 d) of the guideline for the treatment of public petitions :

• of a publication may not be required, especially if the petitioner already public petitions on the website of the Petitions Committee present
  

With this clause could be any further publication of a petition after the first to publish the latest after the second Petitions will be rejected.

The petitions, which I do burn on the nails:

1. change in policy for the handling of public petitions
2. protection of personal data by petitioners for public petitions

Here again is the link to unpublished ePetition to nuclear utilities and waste disposal .

---

Update 2009-09-24

Today I have an answer in the mail. In short, it is said to justify the rejection:

"I ask for their understanding that the Petitions Committee ...
them apart, to justify refusal to release to the petitioner
."

Furthermore, the letter sounds not as if the petition would violate the guidelines, but would now now there are other reasons that would not call the committee published.

Unfortunately, this creates the suspicion that the Petitions Committee of the publication of petitions arbitrarily prevents. The "it" is written in the letter actually small.

detail here the full response:

Now I ask myself what can you do?

Has the petition, the potential that an appeal to many people, the petition itself again submit the same wording as ePetition making a difference?

.. parallel to collect signatures classic? moldy

Or the petition in a file somewhere be ...?