Tuesday, January 4, 2011

كراك ميكر

on the current dioxin scandal and past and future price increases for food

Yet another food scandal of dioxin pollution in chicken eggs. Bon appetit ... Debt, except as some invited guests remarked on the news channel N-TV, ultimately the consumer. Wishing namely its food simply do not pay enough, the price war in the area of food is nowhere as brutal as in Germany. Nowhere in Europe are as cheap as the food with us. The German consumer is more willing to invest in good oil for his car, as in his food.

They have highly questionable such statements, I think. With cheap half-truths presented to us as "news" and opinions of so-called "experts", we are told the world ...

would have been worth mentioning, that Germany has created in recent years one of the largest low-wage sectors , Boasts as former Chancellor Schroeder public - of course not with us, but in Davos ...
At about 7 million people, or 10 percent of the population, either in full or in spite of work are partly dependent on social transfers from the State and more under as close to the subsistence living, it is no wonder, if not more money for food can be issued.

to want to be derived from statistical data, the German consumer would spend more money for the oil change on his car, as for food, I think is more than questionable. Times completely ignoring the fact that an oil change in a car only once a year is paid, food must be consumed but every day of the year.
In addition, you can simplify statistics collected from data of millions of people not in such a way as if it was actually always the same people. That could make it, perhaps, if the living conditions of large sections of populations such as were identical. This is not however so, so you have to ask, are those who want to spend much money for the engine oil of their vehicle, even the same ones who have to skimp on food so extreme? Answer: I do not know, and I know I do not know ...

But I assume that this is different acting groups in society: those who have little money for food, eating, and therefore have the so-called "bars" with. Who ever anyway no money for a car, and do not need machine oil. Then those who have a car and need for various reasons, some come to it in their low-paid, and for which therefore the money for food is very scarce.
And finally, even those who have a car, perhaps a limited budget surplus and therefore do not skimp on the machine oil. Whether that are exactly the same, of which an want to spend money on food? I doubt it ...

Pretty sure I'm on the other hand here is that this scandal once again used to create the right atmosphere to prepare ourselves and to rising food prices. Whether rising food prices will actually provide more quality, I dare even to doubt. Because despite the supposed climate warming, it will in the years to continue falling temperatures give . Cool weather is not good for the planet - quite the contrary. When the sun and heat are missing, increases the risk of crop failure. Therefore, the food prices will likely continue to rise. Because they are a variety of reasons anyway already risen - for example due to the use of agricultural land for the cultivation of biodiesel, to counteract the global warming is not occurring. Another reason for the worldwide rise in food prices also is the destruction of local farms and the acquisition of agricultural land by the International Food Quartell consisting of Monsanto, Unilever, Kraft, etc.

Beautiful, exceptionally, with future price increases also is sometimes to the consumer, and not considering the returns of any shareholders. Of those, will still continue to have no more money for the purchase of food, then probably expected to not complain when they find that they have machine-poured cooking oil over the salad instead ...


Flattr this

0 comments:

Post a Comment