Recommended Gynae Mumbai

sanctions against Hartz IV recipients - in the public interest?

The recently published sanctions against the 4th Months pregnant young woman have caused a stir in the Internet-after decided the first Abeitsagentur in Brunswick, was that the repeal of the three-month starvation diet for the woman and her unborn child is not in the public interest is, she finally decided to yet again for it.

After our constitution, especially the fundamental rights (human dignity, inviolability of the home, freedom of movement, prohibition of forced labor), both in our social life, buried and in our hearts (I reap just tired smile when I talk like this ...), we want to consider whether sanctions against Hartz IV recipients really in the "public interest" are - of course, a purely economic view, because as long as one's bank balance even more cause for satisfaction, or - should not that be the case - there are enough people that are doing at least as dirty as oneself, is for the German - in the Basic Law and to democratic principles, confessing - Citizens apparently the world still in order.

The functioning of our economic system is based on the principle of supply and demand. Who the workers their share of economic growth withholding, provides a strangulation of the demand. This in turn harms the business, products or services for the internal market offers. He makes less profit because he has to offer its products cheaper when he still wants to sell at all. An entrepreneur must accept a rule loans, interest rates rise exponentially, and of course he praises the cost into the products with one - is indeed no different, or he would go broke. The growing cost of interest and repayment be borne by the consumer. They can not be reduced - where would we be there when we would demand of bank shareholders 'tighten their belts' and to refrain from expected returns! So the entrepreneur reduces the cost of labor, such as disgusted by the permanent staff of the company and gets instead temporary workers, or - even cheaper - 'trainees' sets, or to prefabricated of the so-called 'New Labour' products can.

The workers here have so little money they can out of the daily requirement of food to buy anything more - so where is the manufacturing for the domestic market business sale For his goods? Demand falls, .. with them the wages, which has a further drop in demand for the episode, etc.

The less money in circulation, the less can be sold. Thus, if the employment agencies impose sanctions against Hartz IV recipients is anything but 'economic action', as it is lately so beautiful. It is unlikely that a Hartz IV recipients the money for ongoing assistance for living costs for a rainy places - it will put the money in circulation in any case, probably by buying food for it. Thus provides also the recipient: Hartz IV, with its use for - though due to limited financial resources, low - demand, stimulating the domestic economy, with everything what belongs to - including the hanging thereon jobs.

What I hope to be the case in most cases, we will be able to actually sanctioned and thus condemned to starvation Hartz IV recipients somehow, but still have financial Raise funds with which he secures his survival only once - for example by anhaut anyone from his circle of acquaintances to lend him some money. But even so, the demand gap is not closed, because even the one who borrows the money to the needy, in turn, practice elsewhere use waiver must - it can not be assumed that a has to Hartz IV affected people in his circle, the a few million to have the high edge, which would now be brought into circulation in addition ...

In summary, it can be said that Hartz IV recipients cuts are never in the public interest - even if it is in should be of general interest to take the erosion of basic rights in this country in favor of an improved economic situation tacitly accepted.

For with the exception of benefits for export manufacturing companies or their shareholders in this country, NO ONE on this period of sanctions - not even in economic terms!

So much for the "public interest" ...